Control the Food

This is happening in Europe now but it is only a very short hope “across the pond” as they say.   Remember what the war criminal Henry Kissinger said:

Kissinger: “Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.”

http://www.naturalnews.com/040214_seeds_European_Commission_registration.html

Virtually all plants, vegetable seeds and gardeners to eventually be registered by government    

Most heirloom seeds to be criminalized

A new law proposed by the European Commission would make it illegal to “grow, reproduce or trade” any vegetable seeds that have not been “tested, approved and accepted” by a new EU bureaucracy named the “EU Plant Variety Agency.”
It’s called the Plant Reproductive Material Law, and it attempts to put the government in charge of virtually all plants and seeds. Home gardeners who grow their own plants from non-regulated seeds would be considered criminals under this law.
“This law will immediately stop the professional development of vegetable varieties for home gardeners, organic growers, and small-scale market farmers,” said Ben Gabel, vegetable breeder and director of The Real Seed Catalogue. “Home gardeners have really different needs – for example they grow by hand, not machine, and can’t or don’t want to use such powerful chemical sprays. There’s no way to register the varieties suitable for home use as they don’t meet the strict criteria of the Plant Variety Agency, which is only concerned about approving the sort of seed used by industrial farmers.”

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040214_seeds_European_Commission_registration.html#ixzz2U68NnkhQ

Good News, Good News, Good News, and then Bad News

GW and his daughter testifying at the Agriculture Committee.

GW and his daughter testifying at the Agriculture Committee.

Hurrah, several local food sovereignty bills have been voted out of the Agriculture committee of the Maine Legislature as “ought to pass.”  Here are some excerpts from the Bangor Daily News article about the work sessions:

 

“The Joint Standing Committee on Agriculture, Forestry and Conservation voted that two key bills — LD 1282 and LD 1287 — ought to pass when they are taken up by the full Legislature.

The committee also voted “ought to pass” on several bills aimed at Maine’s poultry industry. LD 218 exempts farmers who grow and slaughter fewer than 1,000 birds annually from state inspection and licensure, as long as they sell the poultry from the farm or deliver to the consumer’s home. LD 259 would allow the owners of slaughterhouses to rent their facilities to other farmers. LD 836 establishes a legal mechanism for the operation of mobile poultry slaughtering facilities.”

 

Anti GMO rally at the State House.

Anti GMO rally at the State House.

The GMO bill is in work session today.  LD 718.  With the way the Ag committee has voted lately I am very hopeful that this bill will also get a favorable vote.

The bad news is a that the Supreme Court came out with its decision yesterday against the farmer being sued by Monsanto for planting seeds he bought, not from them but, from a local grain elevator.    Okay, okay it was not the best case to take all the way to the high court so we will have to try again.   The OSGATA/Pubpat suit is a good solid suit that we can hope will succeed when it finally makes it way to the top of the judicial pile.

 

“Although Monsanto and other agrochemical companies assert that they need the current patent system to invent better seeds, the counterargument is that splicing an already existing gene or other DNA into a plant and thereby transferring a new trait to that plant is not a novel invention. A soybean, for example, has more than 46,000 genes. Properties of these genes are the product of centuries of plant breeding and should not, many argue, become the product of a corporation. Instead, these genes should remain in the public domain.”

Here are some other links I’ve been compiling for a while:

 

http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs122/1104248386985/archive/1112571595184.html

 

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/448-farm-and-food-policy/16718-focus-monsanto-protection-act-ignites-massive-activism

 

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/448-farm-and-food-policy/16689-focus-monsanto-wrote-monsanto-protection-act

 

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/16705-monsanto-teams-up-with-congress-to-shred-the-constitution

Veggies = Speciality Crops

 

So yesterday was about state politics.   Here is what’s going on in Washington.   Don’t you just love it that our government think of the foods that feed us,  fruits and vegetables, as “specialty crops?”  Anyhow, here’s what they’re up to in DC:

 

 

Subcommittee Examines Specialty Crop Programs
for the 2013 Farm Bill

 

WASHINGTON – Today, Rep. Austin Scott, Chairman of the House Agriculture Committee’s Subcommittee on Horticulture, Research, Biotechnology and Foreign Agriculture, held a public hearing to examine specialty crop priorities for the 2013 Farm Bill. The Subcommittee heard from growers and representatives of the specialty crop community on the effectiveness of the current programs within the Subcommittee’s jurisdiction.

Last summer, the Agriculture Committee reported H.R. 6083, the Federal Agriculture, Reform, and Risk Management Act (FARRM). The FARRM Act achieved $35 billion in savings to reduce the federal deficit, while expanding popular and successful programs that recognize the diversity of U.S. specialty crops, including fruits, vegetables, nuts, horticulture, and nursery crops.

“Growth in the specialty crops sector can play an integral role in our economic recovery. As we continue to examine farm policy and prepare to reauthorize the farm bill, it is essential that we expand on our past successes with programs that help grow our nation’s economy,” said Chairman Austin Scott (R-GA-8).

“This hearing is an important step forward in crafting a twenty-first century farm bill that invests in programs that generate significant domestic crop value.  Under the current farm bill, specialty crop programs that finance research and encourage value added production, not direct payments to farmers, receive only a fraction of overall funding. However, specialty crops as a whole make up nearly half of all domestic farm gate crop value. As the House Agriculture Committee works to reauthorize the farm bill, we must recognize the need to substantially fund our specialty crop programs in order to enhance the competitiveness of American agriculture and strengthen it going forward,” said Ranking Member Kurt Schrader (D-OR-5).

Written testimony provided by the witnesses is linked below.

Witness List:

Panel I

Ms. Sarah M. Frey-Talley, President and CEO, Frey Farms, Keenes, Illinois

Mr. William L. Brim, President and Owner, Lewis & Taylor Farms, Inc., Tifton, Georgia

Mr. Barry Bushue, Vice President, American Farm Bureau Federation, President, Oregon Farm Bureau Federation, Boring, Oregon

###

 

LD 718: Labeling GMOs

Yesterday I went down to Augusta, again, to testify before the Legislature’s Joint Standing Committee on Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry in favor of LD 718 “An Act to Protect Maine Food Consumers’ Right to Know About Genetically Engineered Food and Seed Stock.”   Well, that was the old name of the bill.   On Monday the “and Seed Stock” was stricken from the bill because of a federal preemption on seed labeling, a fact about which I am not happy.   But be that as it may (good old sausage making) here is my testimony:

Senator Jackson, Representative Dill, distinguished members of the committee.   My name is Betsy Garrold and I am here today testifying on behalf of Food for Maine’s Future in support of LD 718. Food for Maine’s Future is a member-based organization of advocates and activists for small farmers, farm workers, and their patrons who are standing together against corporate monopolies. Just as the Grange set out to do when it began over a hundred and forty years ago, Food for Maine’s Future is helping Maine communities protect and preserve their interests against the interests of agribusiness corporations.

There is a “good” reason why genetically modified foods are not labeled.  Although good is not exactly the right word, it is because of the FDA’s ruling/actions that GMOs are no different than any other food. This ruling contradicts the findings of the US Patent Office, which has granted numerous patents for this “novel invention”.  Don’t you wish the Washington bureaucrats would get there stories straight?  No corporation has benefited more from this paradox than the Monsanto Company.  This monolithic company has used its patents on GMO technologies to sue US farmers and farm businesses[1].  They have worked hard to consolidate the global seed industry[2].   All in order to increase sales of Round Up and other chemicals for which these GMO seeds are specifically designed[3].

Last November, the Friday before Thanksgiving, in one of their infamous Friday afternoon news dumps, the US Department of Justice announced it had closed its two-year anti-trust investigation into Monsanto’s seed business.  No charges were brought in this case. There was no press release. No public records are available of the investigation or of the findings.

Monsanto controls or has a financial interest in 80% of the corn and 93% of soybeans produced in this country.  They sell the hundreds of millions of pounds of herbicides used on these crops. For millions and millions of people in this country these foods are the basis of their diet.  They depend on these staple foods for survival. That, by definition, makes this monopoly an anti-trust violation.

This committee will hear many reasons today why Mainer’s deserve the right to know what is in their food, how it is grown and processed.  All are valid and worthy of support. Food for Maine’s Future asks that you also consider whether the interests of corporations such as Monsanto supercede the request of the people before you today. Who and what is government truly protecting when they exempt this novel invention from a simple label?

We would like to leave you with two documents in addition to our testimony. One is a list of high-level political appointees with ties to Monsanto. The second is a chart showing Monsanto’s control over the seed industry and profits from its chemical sales since 1996. Both have citations and additional references.

And one last thought.  Vandana Shiva, noted feminist, ecologist and author said, “Without seed sovereignty there is no food sovereignty.”

 

Thank you for your time and patience.

 


[1] Monsanto vs. US Farmers, 2010 Update, Center for Food Safety

[2] Global Seed Industry Concentration, 2005, ETC Group

 

[3] SEC investigates Monsanto’s Roundup Biz, Mother Jones, July 19, 2011

 

 

 

This testimony, written with enormous help from my friend and co-conspirator Bob St. Peter, was the hit of the afternoon.    I always hope, when I testify, that  the committee members will not ask any difficult questions.   In fact, I hope for no questions at all, but yesterday something in this testimony really caught the committee’s imagination.   I was kind of surprised because it was late, late in the afternoon and there were still about 40 people on the list to testify.   They were going to be there all night but they seemed to want someone to talk about the elephant in the room.   I don’t remember the exact question (I don’t mind public speaking but I do get a bit nervous) but it gave me the opportunity to say that what the real impact of this bill will be is to decrease Monsanto’s bottom line and that is why the bio-tech industry is fighting this issue so forcefully across the country.   Then my representative, Brian Jones, asked if I thought this was a political issue.   And I said that since the Supreme Court has said money=speech and since we hope the impact of this bill will be to make people “vote with their food dollars” that, yes, this is a political issue.   There was a question about setting food policy that I don’t recall now.   I will try to get a transcript of the hearings and post the really questions and my full answers.

Anyhow, more fun at the sausage factory.   MOFGA organized a presser and rally before the hearing that was VERY well attended.   There were easily 150 people there on a Tuesday afternoon.  It turned into quite a party.    They had to open up two overflow rooms for people to listen to the testimony.   At one point an opponent of the bill called all the proponents there a “special interest group.”   It was one of the many less than truthful pieces of testimony the opponents entered into the record during the hearing.    If 90%+ of the population in Maine is a “special interest group”  then I guess I just do not understand the meaning of the term.

 

 

 

 

Local Food Rules!

It really has been two months since I last posted on this particular blog.   I have not been idle and to prove that point I am posting below the full text of my testimony before the Maine Legislative Joint Standing Committee on Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry on the local food sovereignty bill.  I gave that testimony on April 2nd.   On the 23rd of this month we will be testifying before that same committee on LD 718 a bill that will force the labeling of foods containing more that 0.9% GMO ingredients.   But here, in lieu of a post I need to write about GMO matters before the Supreme Court, is my personal testimony on LD 475:

 

“Good afternoon Senator Jackson, Representative Dill and members of the committee, including the representative for my home district Representative Jones and the sponsor of this bill Representative Hickman, who happens to represent my best friend’s home district.

 

My name is Betsy Garrold; I live and farm in Knox.   I work part-time in the produce department at the Belfast Food Co-op.  I am also the Board President of Food for Maine’s Future an organization that has been at the forefront of the movement for local food sovereignty.  I am here today to speak in favor of the development of this proposed bill LD 475, An Act To Increase Food Sovereignty in Local Communities.

 

It is important, as we all know, to keep the local food economy healthy by supporting the production, distribution and consumption of wholesome Maine food.   A vibrant local food system is, as Martha Stewart would say, a good thing.   It is a good thing for many reasons: it creates jobs, provides healthy fresh food, and keeps the money circulating in the local economy but I am here to contend that the most vital reason for eating local food is safety and security.

 

We can trust our local farmers, more than Wal-Mart or any other mega food distributor, to care about the food they provide, to take pride in it and most importantly to care about whether we get sick from eating it.   When the farmer is handing you a bag of produce, meat, or dairy products each week at the CSA pick up they know they are going to be seeing you again soon.   They will see you and your family at the local store, at town meetings or at church.   They are not going to hand you a bag of salmonella or E. coli contaminated food.   Because the social contract of a small community would not stand for them doing so and also because they are not schmucks.   They care about you as a customer, a neighbor, a friend.

 

When I researched food borne illnesses for this testimony I found that of the top 15 deadliest outbreaks only one was linked back to a small-time local butcher.   That was in 2005 in Wales.   The rest were all tied to large food processing operations.   Faceless corporations that you will never meet at the local gas station or see in your next Grange meeting.

 

In January of this year the FDA proposed new rules designed, they say, to further enhance the safety of the food supply in this country. One rule requires “science-based standards for growing, harvesting, packing and holding produce on domestic and foreign farms.” It addresses a variety of possible routes of food contamination including the manure used as fertilizer, water sprayed on crops, animals in the fields, whether workers wash their hands and how packing houses process foods.  The other rule sets out guidelines for “preventive controls for human food” and would require companies to have plans for food borne illnesses.  Can I just say both of these rules sound an awful lot like the fox guarding the hen-house to me?   But that is beside the point.   I have always felt that most FDA and USDA food safety inspection rules were window dressing.   Designed, like Homeland Security color coded threat alerts, to give us a false sense of safety and security.   The bureaucrats realize that making the food system totally safe is impossible.   Their job is to keep commerce humming and lull the populace into believing that the food we eat has been carefully vetted for any contamination.   Again foxes and hen houses.

 

Even if a corporation was found to be selling contaminated food what is the penalty?  In 2011 when there was an outbreak of deadly Listeria tied to cantaloupes grown on Jensen Farms, a very large fruit producer, a news article about the case against them stated,  “charges might be brought under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act for the adulteration of food. Under the Act, knowingly selling adulterated food is a felony. But doing so without knowledge or intent to defraud consumers is a misdemeanor, penalized by up to a year in prison or a $1,000 fine.”   Well, you can’t put a corporation in jail and $1000 is chump change to these large producers.   They write it off as a cost of doing business.

 

 

There was one hopeful aspect of the new FDA rules, however.  An official was quoted as saying at the time of the release of the new rules “we have a clear direction from Congress to collaborate with state agencies so we expect much of the oversight to come at the state and local level.”   And so we ask the state of Maine to take this opportunity to recognize the authority of municipalities to govern their own food system.   I am asking the legislature to make the Maine food system the safest in the world by staying out of the way of farmers selling their safe, healthy, local food directly to their neighbors.”

 

After I finished my testimony one of the legislators (I believe it was Rep. Dill) asked me what I considered “local”  I replied that as a locavore I try to eat a “100 mile diet” and explained that concept to him.  It was not a great answer but fortunately Bob St. Peter spoke later and explained that within the concept of this proposed bill “local” would be defined as within the municipality that had passed the ordinance.

It was all very exciting and then we all went to a cocktail party for legislators sponsored by MOFGA so that we could show them excerpts from the movie “The Future of Food”  and scyped with Deborah Koons Garcia the producer of the documentary.   A long day and one that gave me great appreciation for the stamina of our legislators and even for the lobbyists.

 

 

God Made a Farmer and Then He Made Monsanto

So I watched the “God Made a Farmer” commercial on YouTube (because I do not watch the Superbowl, but that is a different post, suffice it to say I call Superbowl Sunday “The Biggest Single Day of Domestic Violence Incidence in the Year”  which it is)  and of course I got all misty because Paul Harvey was one hell of a writer even if his politics are a bit too conservative for me.   I was torn.  It was a great piece.   Even if it was a commercial for a gas guzzling road hog.   I wondered how I could, in good conscience, blog about it.   Then my friend Tom Luther sent me this on Facebook.   Thanks Tom.   Think of these as both sides of the story.  Or better yet think of it as…the rest of the story.

 

3/2/13 Update.   The funny video has been removed.   Thanks Monsanto.   We should all chip together and buy them a sense of humor.

3/10/13 Update #2.  See the comment section of my post “Broken Girls”  one of my wonderful followers has put the funny video there.  I will try to move it back into this post when I have a minute but for now it is there.   Thanks!

 

Broken Girls

I have mulled this particular post for a couple of months now.   I think this is the perfect day for it.

I originally was going to call it “Two Broken Girls” because the initial inspiration was the juxtaposition of an image of Malal Yousufzai (the brave young Pakistani girl whom the Taliban attempted to assassinate for her outspoken defense of educating girls and women) against the soft core porn pedaled by such mainstream American comedies as “Two Broke Girls” (I have a lot of other problems with that particular show but when they had a scene where the leads slapped each other suggestively that was the final straw).

Then Jyoti Singh Pandey was raped and murdered in India causing that country to finally come to its senses and speak out en masse against this formerly silent crime.   And Anene Booysen was raped and murdered in South Africa igniting a similar series of protests in South Africa.   I began to feel hopeful that there really was a shift in the zeitgeist and that women and children were going to get the protection they need and deserve.

In the last couple of days I have become less optimistic.   The federal Violence Against Women Act was finally renewed in the Senate.   But 22 rich, old, white men (yes, I know at least one of them was black but I think in this case we can be pretty sure he’s really white in his heart of hearts) voted against it and they will most likely be reelected next time they run.   So there’s that.

But the WORST and MOST DISCOURAGING thing that I saw recently was at the State of the Union address on Tuesday night.   Mr. Obama was talking about equal pay for equal work.   Actually using his bully pulpit to advocate that women should not be making 75 cents for every dollar a man makes.   The camera panned the audience and I saw three congresswomen looking grim, shaking their heads and one of them actually mouthed the word “no”.   These three gender traders were Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA,) Lynn Jenkins (R-KS,) and Virginia Foxx (R-NC).   I urge anyone who reads this and is a constituent of any of these women to contact them and tell them exactly how wrong they are.    Economic violence is in many ways much, much worse than physical violence.   Physical violence you can walk away from or recover from but women who live in poverty (and most people living below the poverty level are women and their children) cannot just walk away.   And any society that says it is protecting the female half of their population while still not providing the ability to earn a living wage is just flat-out lying.

And don’t even get me started on the whole Sport’s Illustrated swimsuit issue mess.   This is what we are telling our young women.  The only way to economic success is getting mostly naked and posing for a photograph that will then be plastered five stories high on the side of a building in NYC.   That too is a form of economic and psychological violence.

We have had better models offered to us.  Roseanne Barr being one.   That woman is who she is and makes no apologies for it.    A woman who has been successful on her own terms telling the truth about what life is really like for most women and their families in this country.  Gabby Gifford, a woman struggling to overcome the effects of the most violent of attacks, a gun shot to the head, and still firmly resolved to do what she can to make this country a kinder, gentler place.   And yes, even Hillary Clinton, although I am not a big fan, I do admire her dedication and determination to find peaceful, non-violent solutions whenever she possibly could during her tenure as Secretary of State.  She worked so hard that she may have sacrificed her own health in the process.   You have to admire that kind of guts and determination.

So how does all of this tie together?   I don’t know.   I just know that until women start respecting themselves more it is going to be damn hard for anyone else to respect us.   And the truth is that when you don’t respect someone it is mighty easy to treat that person in an abusive way.   Maybe that’s it.  That’s the message.   Love and respect.   Two great things to be thinking about on this Valentine’s Day.

P.S.   As I was editing this post the spell checker highlighted “congresswomen” and offered me the choices of “congresswoman”  or “congressmen”!!!   What the fuck WordPress?    There can only be one congresswoman but many congressmen.   Talk about hidden sexism.   I am disappointed to say the least.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 379 other followers